[San92a,San92b,San93a,San93b] decide to increase the latest abilities of Dowty’s prototype positions from the along with about defining groups qualities that are crucial into character regarding semantic verb (sub)categories. Including, it’s well known one at least half a dozen subtypes out-of mental verbs can be recognized centered on semantic characteristics of the stimulus and you may experiencer arguments (find [Jac90] and you may recommendations therein), since shown in Desk dos.step one.
When you look at the multiple-stratal tissues, D-design is apparently a pure structural logo from thematic relations, no amount its syntactic words; this might explain as to why GB lexical representations do not methodically enjoys to establish the brand new syntactic phrase off arguments
For the multiple-stratal structures, D-design seems to be an absolute architectural signal off thematic relations, irrespective of their syntactic expressions; this may identify as to why GB lexical representations do not systematically have in order to identify this new syntactic expression out of objections
|
- locative specifying (the causation out of) action, age.grams. subj/obj out of put
- certified indicating the new production and destruction off objects, age.grams. subj/obj off make
- count indicating (brand new causation from) alterations in figure, proportions, number and you may shade of an item, e.g. subj/obj regarding painting
- intentional indicating causation and alter of your propositional attitudes of men and women, elizabeth.g. subj/obj out of show your
In multi-stratal frameworks, D-design is apparently a pure structural symbolization away from thematic interactions, no matter the syntactic expressions; this could define as to why GB lexical representations do not methodically features so you’re able to identify brand new syntactic phrase out of arguments
| verb category | Associate PREDICATES |
| assertive | hypothesize, insists, suggest |
| directive | ask, buy, encourage |
| commissive | agree, promise |
| expressive | compliment, apologize, anticipate |
| declarative | declare, flames, resign |
| perceptive | hear, look for, touch |
| emotive | fear, for example, please |
| formal | create, eat, destroy |
| matter | paint, knead, carve |
| locative | send, swim, sit |
When you look at the multiple-stratal buildings, D-design is apparently an absolute structural icon off thematic interactions, aside from the syntactic expressions; this may describe as to the reasons GB lexical representations don’t systematically has to identify the latest syntactic phrase off arguments
| locative verb classification | Affiliate PREDICATES |
| +activity, +fashion | swim, go |
| +actions, +assistance | go, arrive at |
| +motion, +recommendations, + style | swim/wal across |
| -action | sit |
Inside multiple-stratal structures, D-construction seems to be a pure structural sign from thematic interactions, irrespective of the syntactic phrases; this may define why GB lexical representations don’t methodically possess to specify new syntactic expression away from arguments
| +onset | source |
| +mid | roadway |
| +onset, +mid | stat |
| +coda | purpose |
- extending this new semantic details along and that causation and alter are given using understanding in the Austin/Searle’s taxonomy from illocutionary acts ([Aus62], [Selizabetha69]), age.grams.
- delivering a requirements from trend , guidance and activity on the locative predicate classification, playing with Talmy’s skills towards characterization out of locative predicates ([Tal85]) , age.g.
- getting a concept of origin, purpose, road and you will stationary fellow member with respect to scenario stages ( Start, Middle, CODA ), age.grams.
Semantic opportunities are believed becoming the source from grammatical relationships in lot of linguistic concepts. Grameworks such as Authorities and you may Binding (GB), Lexical Practical Sentence structure (FG) all the posit a level of semantic, otherwise thematic, affairs that grammatical relations systematically connect. Specifically, semantic spots would be the practical devices used for organising predicate dispute structures for the lexicon, where objections is actually understood based on semantic roles. GB, LFG and FG pursue a great lexicalist method of sentence structure 
that renders brand new lexicon the main cause regarding syntactic representations; what this means is you to grammatical interactions are, one way or another, projected out of predicate conflict structures specified within the lexicon.
The principles powering the newest mapping regarding lexical representations onto syntactic structures are different over the some other theories. A primary improvement can be produced between multi-stratal architecture particularly Bodies and you will Joining and mono-stratal ones particularly Lexical Practical Grammar: while regarding the previous the latest mapping is actually to D- design representations, throughout the latter brand new projection try yourself onto epidermis representations. And that, in GB the attention is approximately exactly how thematic roles is actually mapped to architectural positions from the D-structure; the actual syntactic summary of these spots in the skin out-of the brand new sentence will then be accounted for in the amount of the brand new mapping between D- and you can S-build. By contrast, LFG and you may FG hook up semantic connections directly to its surface syntactic summary. Using this it employs that the mapping conditions throughout the a few circumstances are different. In mono-stratal buildings, like mapping standards need to make up this new type on the syntactic summation of the identical semantic family members in the surface out of the sentence.